docs(profiles): the renderer profile's note has its Recorded line again #625
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
area/accessibility
area/audio
area/input
area/install
area/menu
area/renderer
area/saves
area/upscaling
beanstalk: approved @ 1697603
beanstalk: approved @ 2c5a62e
beanstalk: approved @ 4fd82b7
beanstalk: approved @ 64d6d09
beanstalk: approved @ 6f91fae
beanstalk: approved @ 70a78f9
beanstalk: approved @ 8d361dc
beanstalk: approved @ 9d8356e
beanstalk: approved @ abf2227
beanstalk: approved @ d82f202
beanstalk: approved @ e5f1e40
beanstalk: approved @ ee8ab5f
ci: approved
good first issue
gpu/amd
gpu/igpu
gpu/intel
gpu/nvidia
help wanted
kind
bug
kind
chore
kind
docs
kind
feature
kind
performance
kind
question
needs measurements
platform/linux
platform/macos
platform/steam-deck
platform/windows
preview
priority
critical
priority
high
priority
low
regression
status
blocked
status
confirmed
status
duplicate
status
invalid
status
needs-info
status
wontfix
testing wanted
ci: approved
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
MagicBeanDev/Longshot!625
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "zeldaootr/Longshot:profile-note-recorded-line"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Type: docs · Risk: low · Tested on: Linux, no GPU (game-free check) · Needs: none
Why
tests/test_vk_pgo.pyhas failed onmainsince the profile's note was rewritten for the merged recordings (#599), somainis red before a release candidate. The note still says where each recording was made, but lost theRecorded:line the check asks for, and whichscripts/pipeline_tour.py merge-profile --publishwrites its own note to replace ("in place of the Recorded, GPU and driver, and Compiler lines"). So the note is what changed shape, not the check. No open pull request or claim covers it.How to reproduce
Seen on: Linux (Ubuntu 24.04), no GPU
Settings and switches: none
Steps: on
mainaa95d35f, runpython -I -B tests/test_vk_pgo.pyExpected:
OK: the renderer's play profile is opt-in, and the game's counters keep their own switchActual:
FAIL: its note says where it was recordedWhat changed
One word in
assets/profiles/README.md: the paragraph that introduces the three recordings starts withRecorded:again. Nothing else in the note, the profile or the code changes.assets/profiles/README.md: "Three recordings of anRX_VK_PGO=genrenderer, merged ..." reads "Recorded: three sessions of anRX_VK_PGO=genrenderer, merged ...".Measurements
Verdict: passes: the check fails on
mainand passes on this branch in two interleaved rounds.Hardware: Linux (Ubuntu 24.04, kernel 6.8), x86-64, no GPU used; Python 3.15
Scene: no game: the game-free check
Method: the check run alone, round 1 on main then this branch, round 2 the same again
How to reproduce:
python -I -B tests/test_vk_pgo.pyon each commitaa95d35fac5da416Flags and settings
None
Testing
Tested: on Linux, the check failing on main
aa95d35fand passing here in two interleaved rounds (before this rebase, the same on main6c9edffeat587b985f); it passes at25726217, and the note's only change since ise9bed614(#599's merge), which is what turned it red. The full suite (python -I -B tests/run_all.py, Linux,LONGSHOT_VULKAN_HEADERSset) on main6c9edffewith this and the six other red-check repairs from the same sweep merged locally (1ba90202, not pushed): 525 passed, 4 failed, 51 skipped. Three of the failures fail on main too and have their own pull requests:tests/test_walk_key.py(#497),tests/test_cpm_discovery.py(#561),tests/test_make_game_cache.py(#592). The fourth,tests/test_crash_record.py, timed out waiting 10 s for a signalled child under load and passes alone, twice. Rebased since onto mainaa95d35f, the commit re-authored under the forge's noreply address: its change is identical to before bygit patch-id; onaa95d35fthe check also ran through the runner with g++ 13.3 and with clang 23.1.5, failing on main and passing here.Not tested: nothing else reads the note's text.
Must be tested: None
Risks
What could break: nothing: one word of documentation.
Turning it off: revert the commit
Compatibility: Nothing changes
Checklist
Everyone
type(scope): description) of the status line's type.main. Onto mainaa95d35fwith no conflict; the change is identical to before bygit patch-id.python -I -B tests/run_all.pypasses (any failure that also fails onmainis named). The full run is the one in Testing, on main6c9edffe; after the rebase ontoaa95d35f, the changed check through the runner with g++ and clang, as above.third_party/untouched (a new folder with aPROVENANCE.mdinstead).When it applies
Assisted-by:/Co-Authored-By:trailers.Recorded:again587b985f2aac5da416e7Rebased onto
mainaa95d35f(headac5da416); the commits are re-authored with the forge's noreply address: no code change, the same patches bygit patch-id.Test re-run:
test_vk_pgofails on mainaa95d35f(its note says where it was recorded) and passes here, two interleaved rounds, and through the runner with g++ and clang; the description names the new commit.View command line instructions
Checkout
From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.